Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences

BI Dashboards & Analytics for Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences

BI Dashboards & Analytics for pharmaceuticals & life sciences, built around the constraint that defines the sector: GxP validation means every system change needs documented evidence before it reaches production.

Regulations in scope
5
Systems we integrate
5
Typical first release
6 weeks

What changes when it is pharmaceuticals & life sciences

Two reports disagreeing about revenue destroys confidence in the whole platform. A semantic layer with agreed definitions is what prevents that, and it is a governance decision as much as a technical one.

In pharmaceuticals & life sciences, GxP validation means every system change needs documented evidence before it reaches production. That single fact reshapes how bi dashboards & analytics has to be built here, the guardrails, the approval points and the evidence trail are design inputs rather than things bolted on before go-live.

The workload we are most often asked to take on first is deviation and CAPA drafting, usually integrated against eTMF. Integration comes before intelligence. A model that cannot reach your systems of record is a demo with good manners.

Deployed across regulated and unregulated sectors, with audit trails where the regulator expects them. You own the code, the models where they are open-weight, and the documentation to run it without us.

The sector constraints we design around

Defining constraint
GxP validation means every system change needs documented evidence before it reaches production
Regulations in scope
CDSCO · US FDA 21 CFR Part 11 · EU GMP Annex 11 · GxP validation · ICH guidelines
Systems of record
LIMS · QMS · eTMF · SAP · pharmacovigilance databases
Where we usually start
batch record review

BI Dashboards & Analytics workloads in pharmaceuticals & life sciences

  • batch record review
  • adverse event intake and coding
  • regulatory dossier assembly
  • deviation and CAPA drafting
  • literature monitoring

What is included

  • Metric definitions agreed and documented once
  • A semantic layer so numbers cannot diverge by report
  • Dashboards designed for decisions, not for decoration
  • Scheduled distribution to the people who need it
  • Natural-language follow-up questions over the same data
  • Usage tracking so unused dashboards get retired

Questions from this sector

Can an AI system be GxP validated?

Yes, with a documented validation approach, IQ/OQ/PQ, defined intended use, change control and evidence of consistent performance. We build the validation pack alongside the system, not afterwards.

How do you handle 21 CFR Part 11?

Audit trails, electronic signatures, access control and record integrity designed in from the start, because retrofitting them is effectively a rebuild.

Which BI tool do you use?

Power BI, Metabase, Superset or a custom build, chosen on your licensing, team skills and how much customisation you need. We are not tied to one vendor.

Why do our reports disagree?

Almost always because the same metric is defined differently in different places. A semantic layer with one agreed definition fixes it structurally rather than report by report.

Can non-technical staff ask their own questions?

Yes, natural-language querying over the governed semantic layer, so answers stay consistent with the dashboards.

BI Dashboards & Analytics for pharmaceuticals & life sciences, worth a conversation?

Tell us the workload and the regulation it sits under. We will tell you what is realistic.

Or email bd@dtrasglobal.com · call +91 74118 77878